Search for: All records

The dissonant development of positive and negative lightning leaders is a central question in atmospheric electricity. It is also the likely root cause of other reported asymmetries between positive and negative lightning flashes, including the ones regarding: stroke multiplicity, recoil activity, leader velocities, and emission of energetic radiation. In an effort to contrast lightning leaders of different polarities, we highlight the staggering differences between two rocket‐triggered lightning flashes. The flash beginning with upward positive leaders exhibits an initial continuous current stage followed by multiple sequences of dart leaders and return strokes. On the other, in its opposite‐polarity counterpart, the upward development of negative leaders is by itself the entire flash. As a result, the flash with negative leaders is faster, briefer, transfers less charge to the ground, has lower currents, and smaller spatial extent. We conclude by presenting a discussion on the three fundamental leader propagation modes.

When the electric field below a thunderstorm or other electrified cloud is around 10 kV/m, it is sometimes possible to initiate (“trigger”) an upward‐propagating lightning‐leader by launching a rocket that uncoils a wire from the ground. The triggered leader propagates upward from the tip of the wire lifted by the rocket. When the channel is hot enough, a flash is visible. Triggering is common when the leader carries positive charge, but not when it carries negative charge. This article is about four flashes consisting of triggered negative leaders that branched into low‐altitude regions of positive cloud charge over Langmuir Laboratory in central New Mexico. Measurements of current and the locations of leader channels are available for three of the four flashes. Some current pulses at the ground for Flash 2 originated at negative leader steps more than 3 km away, which is a greater distance than has been reported from video measurements. Flashes 3 and 4 propagated only into thunderstorm lower positive charge, and the average lightning‐charge densities inside the volumes occupied by these two flashes are remarkably close. Our best estimate of density for Flashes 3 and 4 lies between −4.2 and −1.8 C/km³, which is compatible with the large spread in cloud‐charge densities derived from instruments carried on airplanes or balloons into low positive regions in thunderstorms.